Former President Donald Trump has hinted at a potential shift in U.S.-China trade policy by suggesting a reduced tariff rate of 80% on Chinese imports—down from the current 145%—ahead of crucial discussions in Switzerland. While the move appears to soften his earlier hardline stance, the proposed rate still significantly exceeds global trade norms and has stirred reactions among investors, economists, and international partners.
Context: Trump’s New Trade Rhetoric
On his social platform Truth Social, Trump posted Friday:
“80% Tariff on China seems right! Up to Scott B.”
The mention refers to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is set to join other American officials in Switzerland this weekend for high-level meetings with Chinese trade representatives.
The post marks a potential pivot from Trump’s previous stance, where he had firmly dismissed the idea of easing tariffs as a negotiating tactic. Just two days earlier, Trump had declared that he would not lower tariffs to encourage China to join the table.
Yet the 80% figure—while reduced—remains far above the 10% baseline tariff recently agreed upon in the U.S.-U.K. trade agreement finalized on Thursday. This disparity raises questions about the feasibility of restoring smooth U.S.-China trade flows without further concessions.
Current Trade Imbalances
According to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), China remains one of the United States’ most significant trading partners despite ongoing trade tensions.
🇺🇸 U.S.-China Goods Trade Snapshot (2024)
| Trade Category | Value in USD |
|---|---|
| U.S. Exports to China | $143.5 Billion |
| U.S. Imports from China | $438.9 Billion |
➡️ Trade Deficit: Over $295 billion in favor of China.
This lopsided trade balance has been a consistent focal point in Trump’s foreign policy and his “America First” agenda. The former president has often argued that punitive tariffs are necessary to correct years of perceived economic disadvantage.
Is 80% Still Too High?
While a proposed reduction from 145% to 80% may seem dramatic, economists warn it may still be too high to stimulate meaningful trade or attract broad investor confidence. Comparatively, even post-Brexit tariffs between major partners rarely exceed 15%, with most hovering under 10% for industrial goods.
China and the U.S. have each imposed tariffs exceeding 100% on a wide array of goods, especially since trade tensions escalated in April 2024. Many countries that initially faced tariffs from the U.S. have since had those penalties partially lifted—except China, which remains Trump’s primary geopolitical target.
“CHINA SHOULD OPEN UP ITS MARKET TO USA — WOULD BE SO GOOD FOR THEM!!! CLOSED MARKETS DON’T WORK ANYMORE!!!”
— Trump on Truth Social, Friday morning
The post underscores Trump’s frustration with what he perceives as Beijing’s protectionist policies.
Official Expectations for Switzerland Talks
While Trump’s posts stoked anticipation, officials remain cautious about the outcomes of the U.S.-China meetings in Switzerland.
Jamieson Greer, U.S. Trade Representative, told CNBC’s Power Lunch on Thursday:
“We’re not expecting a full trade agreement this weekend. But stability—something we can build on—that’s the goal.”
With both sides entering the talks amid heightened rhetoric and trade restrictions, stakeholders are preparing for what may be a protracted negotiation process.
Economic Risks: Supply Chain & Price Pressure
The trade standoff has already had tangible economic impacts. According to recent shipping data from the Freightos Baltic Index, the volume of Chinese goods shipped to the U.S. has dropped significantly since Q1 2024.
U.S. Imports from China (YoY Decline)
| Quarter | Change in Volume |
|---|---|
| Q1 2023 | — |
| Q1 2024 | -23% |
This decline raises red flags about potential shortages of consumer electronics, pharmaceuticals, and key manufacturing components. Retailers and logistics providers alike are bracing for possible price increases if the trade conflict persists through the summer.
Looking Ahead: Strategic Positioning or Campaign Move?
Some political analysts view Trump’s tariff remarks as a strategic attempt to maintain influence over economic policy discussions ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Elections.
While the comment about an 80% tariff could be part of a negotiation tactic—or even a rhetorical flourish—it signals that Trump’s trade war playbook remains intact: apply pressure, control the narrative, and set the bar high.
In another Truth Social post on Friday, Trump hinted at further developments:
“Many Trade Deals in the hopper, all good (GREAT!) ones!”
That statement suggests ongoing efforts to reshape America’s trade framework beyond just China, although no specific deals were announced.
Also read:
To explore more about U.S.-China trade relations and ongoing tariff data:
-
Beijing’s Bold Retaliation Escalates U.S.-China Trade War, Threatens Global Stability
-
China Strikes Back: 34% Tariff on All U.S. Imports Amid Escalating Trade War
Bottom Line for Investors & Businesses:
The potential easing of tariffs, even at 80%, could mark the beginning of a strategic realignment in U.S.-China trade relations. However, the elevated rate still casts a shadow on near-term recovery for global supply chains. Stakeholders should closely monitor this weekend’s Swiss talks for any signs of meaningful de-escalation.
